PDA

View Full Version : AGE of PLAYERS?


bobert123
03-20-2005, 04:08 PM
how old are you?

ManUpstairs
03-20-2005, 05:14 PM
No one here should be under thirteen, so the first option isn't even necessary.

Sperry
03-20-2005, 05:16 PM
I think we'd best notice the wrong location, oh well. -_-
I voted.

crusty
03-20-2005, 06:03 PM
Who says it's wrong?

Homer43
03-20-2005, 06:17 PM
wow, 9 votes for the same option and none for the others

Sparky
03-20-2005, 06:38 PM
Make that 10

_Gravy
03-20-2005, 06:47 PM
Make that 11. Overall a pointless thread :\

Mime
03-20-2005, 06:57 PM
Make that 12. Ditto to Gravy.

Rambo
03-20-2005, 07:14 PM
I think we'd best notice the wrong location, oh well. -_-
I voted.


We did. Or at least I did.


*moved*

Sperry
03-20-2005, 08:14 PM
Wow, 1/4 short of a score in one column. So sad.
Your age has nothing to do with the site. You may be at it, but that doesn't mean that we'd discuss Martha's trial in here if she joined.
*sees it was moved* tanka!

ManUpstairs
03-20-2005, 10:44 PM
Tanka? Are you trying to speak German snowman? Because if you mean thank you, "Danke" is the word you're looking for.

Sperry
03-21-2005, 12:21 AM
No actually, I wasn't German searching. Just saying thank you oddly, that's all. Ironic.

liven_large
03-21-2005, 06:41 AM
learning german snowman? oh and i voted.

Sperry
03-21-2005, 01:04 PM
*dances* The liven has retunred! Long has it been since you posted, and long has SL fallen unto the folly of dreadful spam. Return, and make anew that which you did!

JoeyG
03-21-2005, 01:25 PM
I think we should have had

Younger
11-12
13-15
16-18
19-25
Older

As opposed to this.

Wurmy
03-21-2005, 06:24 PM
I think we should have had

Younger
11-12
13-15
16-18
19-25
Older

As opposed to this.

too true .. cuz right now it's just way too general since if I vote in 11-20 I could be like 18 or 12 u dont know =/
I think I'm an exception to this forum ... *doesn't feel like saying his real age* :P

Sperry
03-21-2005, 06:31 PM
11-20 100% [ 22 ]This speaks for itself.

Wurmy
03-21-2005, 06:34 PM
11-20 100% [ 22 ]This speaks for itself.

lol thanks for backing me up .. and a lot of other people (its all too vague)

Suggestion: CLOSE this thread, and make a new one making the ages more precise from 10-20 since u know... all the current voted r 10-20 yrs. old =/

Freddy
03-21-2005, 08:09 PM
well no point in voting. its only going to make taht 100% go down to... 100%...
thats a very broad range of ages. especialy in a flash game site. the chances of finding those that aren't in that age range isn't that high.

but for the record, 17 and counting.