View Full Version : Republicans+ Bush supporters= owned!
Resilience
08-09-2006, 09:24 PM
Owned, by the latest poll :) http://news.aol.com/dailypulse/080906/_a/will-we-win-in-iraq/20060809103409990002?ncid=NWS00010000000001
ps. Vote to find out poll resluts
You just linked to an AOL page. I have to contest that, as Time Warner seems to be pretty anti-Bush.
Anyways, polls aren't always a sure-fire thing. I do believe that if a poll is accurate and thorough, it should be taken into the admininstration's account, as the administration is simply the will of the people.
h00pla
08-09-2006, 09:40 PM
1. AOL, that alone discounts anything on their.
2. Public voting. I'm sure they know everything about the Iraq war and are experts on the subject
3. j00, my good man, are a moron for thinking that is "owning" anything
Resilience
08-09-2006, 09:46 PM
1. AOL, that alone discounts anything on their.
2. Public voting. I'm sure they know everything about the Iraq war and are experts on the subject
3. j00, my good man, are a moron for thinking that is "owning" anything How am I a moron for thinking that this is ownage. This is ownage! 60% of the people now don't support the " War on Iraq ". 60%> 40% Bush= Owned. What more do you wan't?
Tanktunker
08-10-2006, 05:11 AM
Doesn't Bush have a 32% approval rating?
Which inversly means Bush has a 68% Disapproval rating?
I mean, you don't have to use that, which is a really meaningless AOL poll, to prove that people do not approve of the job Bush is doing, or has done.
(And BTW, it's 60% of the people that voted on the poll, not 60% of the people in the US)
DarkReality
08-10-2006, 05:14 AM
Public voting. I'm sure they know everything about the Iraq war and are experts on the subject
And the people that vote when it comes to elections are any more politically informed?
Yea, right. They're even dumber than the ones who vote online because in elections, you've even got the people without any computers that don't even know WHERE Iraq is.
We are talking about a Web Service based off of Time Warner as a reliable source for polls? Hey, I like Bush, but that's like asking Fox News if Republicans are better -_-
Mr.Man
08-10-2006, 10:43 AM
For the most part, the party in the minority always has more to prove.
So they vote in more polls and participate in more protests. Most republicans would just skip over that poll because it's a useless internet poll. Democrats, like you, see it as a way to stick it to Bush.
Resilience
08-10-2006, 11:33 AM
For the most part, the party in the minority always has more to prove.
So they vote in more polls and participate in more protests. Most republicans would just skip over that poll because it's a useless internet poll. Democrats, like you, see it as a way to stick it to Bush. Im not a Democrat/Republican. I don't believe in any of that crap. I look at the facts, what the President has in store for our Country and what he plans to do for our Economy. On the other hand, you got all these redneck Republicans that wana fight and go to war and that preety much explains why Bush is our President today. But at-least know the whole world is seighn just how smart Americans are.
h00pla
08-10-2006, 11:38 AM
If you're anti-bush you're a democrat by defaut. That's how the world's perception works.
And you insult republicans just like a democrat so that doesn't help your case much
eatmorchikin6464
08-10-2006, 11:40 AM
Well, on the lighter side, I got 4 out of 4 on the I.Q. test thing on the right.
The first question was the easiest, considering I live in the state that Cynthia McKinney is from/ran for. But I wont give it away!! SHHHHhhh
h00pla
08-10-2006, 11:41 AM
-places censor bar on EMC's location dealy-
Resilience
08-10-2006, 11:44 AM
If you're anti-bush you're a democrat by defaut. That's how the world's perception works.
And you insult republicans just like a democrat so that doesn't help your case much You can call me w/e you wan't. I seriously don't care about this whole " Party " thing. I just insult Republicans, because their President ( which is an idiot ) represents the Republicans. I got no beef againts Democrats.
eatmorchikin6464
08-10-2006, 11:45 AM
-places censor bar on EMC's location dealy-
Well, I'm lieing in that!! <.< >.>
h00pla
08-10-2006, 12:41 PM
You can call me w/e you wan't. I seriously don't care about this whole " Party " thing. I just insult Republicans, because their President ( which is an idiot ) represents the Republicans. I got no beef againts Democrats.
you obviously do care since you hate the Republican PARTY.
Homer43
08-10-2006, 12:44 PM
You can call me w/e you wan't. I seriously don't care about this whole " Party " thing. I just insult Republicans, because their President ( which is an idiot ) represents the Republicans. I got no beef againts Democrats.
So if Bush was a democrat your views would be swapped?
Resilience
08-11-2006, 12:49 PM
So if Bush was a democrat your views would be swapped? No. If bush was still a ### about this whole " War on Iraq " stuff, I would hate him as much if he were a Democrat. As a matter of fact, I told you I don't care about these so called " parties ". Why did you even bother asking me?
ToKillAnATTICUS
08-11-2006, 12:53 PM
I'd like to see a post without ad hominem, please?
h00pla
08-11-2006, 01:43 PM
No. If bush was still a ### about this whole " War on Iraq " stuff, I would hate him as much if he were a Democrat. As a matter of fact, I told you I don't care about these so called " parties ". Why did you even bother asking me?
He showing you that you are a moron -.-
If bush happened to be democrat you'd insult the entire party despite the fact that they oppose his views.
Like me insulting everyone on this forum because you happen to represent them. I'd be a complete dolt for doing it. like you are
Homer43
08-11-2006, 01:49 PM
If bush happened to be democrat you'd insult the entire party despite the fact that they oppose his views.
That was the exact objective of my post, Resilience.
Resilience
08-11-2006, 04:08 PM
He showing you that you are a moron -.-
If bush happened to be democrat you'd insult the entire party despite the fact that they oppose his views.
Like me insulting everyone on this forum because you happen to represent them. I'd be a complete dolt for doing it. like you are Not really, because like you said " if Bush was a Democrat they would oppose his views ". Given that fact, he would never be a Democrat and he would still be the same crazy guy with the same crazy ideas. So I would be insulting something that would never happend. Get with reality please.
Homer43
08-11-2006, 05:46 PM
Theoretical questions are a fair tool in debates.
Resilience
08-11-2006, 09:25 PM
Theoretical questions are a fair tool in debates. True, but facts are always better than " if's " and " whats " and all that theoretical junk.
greenwally
08-11-2006, 09:36 PM
To quote Steven Colbert:
"83% of Americans supported Hitler. Does that make it right? NO."
Something along those lines, and obviously he was joking, but he got his point across.
Just because a majority of people believe something is right, doensn't mean that it is right.
Plus, that poll was from AOL. LOL
h00pla
08-11-2006, 09:43 PM
True, but facts are always better than " if's " and " whats " and all that theoretical junk.
Except that this has nothing to do with facts. This has to do with your stupidity, which granted is thus far a fact. But we're showing you that because of the man who "represents" every last republican (according to you) you immeadiately group us all as the morons you percieve this one man to be. Nevermind that there are those who don't hold the same view as him.
Resilience
08-11-2006, 09:58 PM
Except that this has nothing to do with facts. This has to do with your stupidity, which granted is thus far a fact. But we're showing you that because of the man who "represents" every last republican (according to you) you immeadiately group us all as the morons you percieve this one man to be. Nevermind that there are those who don't hold the same view as him. You obiously didn't read what me and Homer were talking about. Next time before you try to look like your all smart and intelligent actually do some research.
" This has to do with your stupidity, which granted thus for a fact ". Since when has this thread been about Since when the thread I made has to do with my stupidity? If all your gona do is flame at me and not have a legit debate, then let me know so I can report you for flamming and for spamming my topic.
But we're showing you that because of the man who "represents" every last republican ( according to you ) you immeadiately group us all as the morons you percieve this one man to be. According to me?!?!?!?! Prove to me when I said that " Bush represents every last republican " and this won't be complete and utter spam. I group ya'll as morons?!?!?!?! Bush is a moron yes. But are you calling yourself a moron? Cause I am yet to call any of ya'll morons. Unlike you sir.
h00pla
08-11-2006, 10:02 PM
According to me?!?!?!?! Prove to me when I said that " Bush represents every last republican " and this won't be complete and utter spam. I group ya'll as morons?!?!?!?! Bush is a moron yes. But are you calling yourself a moron? Cause I am yet to call any of ya'll morons. Unlike you sir.
I just insult Republicans, because their President ( which is an idiot ) represents the Republicans.
Consider yourself owned
You obiously didn't read what me and Homer were talking about. Next time before you try to look like your all smart and intelligent actually do some research.
He was showing you that you were a moron for insulting the entire republican party (which you really were) because of one man, saying that every one was like him.
again, owned.
DarkReality
08-12-2006, 05:35 AM
I suggest you two stop unnecessarily flaming one another. You"re acting like children.
Resilience
08-12-2006, 08:40 AM
Consider yourself owned
He was showing you that you were a moron for insulting the entire republican party (which you really were) because of one man, saying that every one was like him.
again, owned. Are you an idiot or what? I insult " Republicans " because they chose a loser to run this country. I don't insult every single Republican you dolt. Get your facts straight.
Tanktunker
08-12-2006, 08:47 AM
"Republicans" is alot of people.
Actually, it's every single Republican.
h00pla
08-12-2006, 10:43 AM
I suggest you two stop unnecessarily flaming one another. You"re acting like children.
Just how I get my kicks and giggles.
Hincker
08-12-2006, 10:46 AM
At the beginning bush was doing pretty good i liked him now for all i care he can just get kicked out of office...
Vagrant
08-12-2006, 11:25 AM
At the beginning bush was doing pretty good i liked him now for all i care he can just get kicked out of office...
You have him for a year and a half more. Deal with it. I know I'll be voting in the next election.
The war in Iraq is unpopular, yes, but 60% to 40% is a very marginal percent. That means, if there are 350 million people (All voting in this poll, which is doubtful) in the US, there are 140 million people who still support the war. That's a huge amount of people. You can't necessarily label them as "idiots."
h00pla
08-12-2006, 12:48 PM
You have him for a year and a half more. Deal with it. I know I'll be voting in the next election.
The war in Iraq is unpopular, yes, but 60% to 40% is a very marginal percent. That means, if there are 350 million people (All voting in this poll, which is doubtful) in the US, there are 140 million people who still support the war. That's a huge amount of people. You can't necessarily label them as "idiots."
You can very well label them as idiots. It's just a matter of how it portrays you as the labeler. Depending on the group you're with is how you'll be recieved for it. It is well within my power to label all democrats as complete morons but that could and most likely would cause everyone to label me as a complete idiot
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.