Flash MX 2004 or Director MX 2004?

[sn1per]

Hi everybody!

Here's a poll. Do you think the Director MX 2004 is better to make game or is it Flash MX 2004? Well, if you not have these program you don't need to vote :wink:

[The Brown Cow]

Hmmm... shockwave is more powerful, but harder to work with.

I've never actually used Director, so I don't really know. I do like Flash though :)

[sn1per]

I've tried to use Director but I understand 0.00000000%

[Nexus]

I'm the same as Shadow25. Never tried Director, but I know its much much more powerful. It is meant for 3D games (well, thats what it's capable of). I would recommend if you were new to the whole flash thing to stick with MX.

[sn1per]

actually flash can also make game in 3d but it's not pretty well...

[The Brown Cow]

actually flash can also make game in 3d but it's not pretty well...

But they run really slowly and are impractical.

[Darc^2]

i made a 3d game in flash. i posted here in this forum and it didnt run slow at all. mind you it wasnt some vast game but it didnt lag down like you guys are talking. i havent used director but i imagine it would be a pain in the butt to learn. i have a hard enough time with flash.

later

[The Brown Cow]

Yes, but it's pseudo-3D. No ray-tracing or wireframes involved.

That's been done in flash, but no one's taking it past a single object. Flash is too slow.

[denacioust]

Some 3d stuff's been done in Flash by Strille which is pretty great and very fast