Counting to a million threads--what's the point?

[Caesar Augustus]

If a post appears in the thread every thirty seconds, nonstop 24/7, it would take 30,000,000 seconds to complete, that's 500,000 minutes, which is 8333+(1/3) hours, which is 347+(2/9) days, or just over 95% of a year. That's just not reasonable...

EDIT: This was supposted to be in spammerland, oh well... not the end of the earth.

[Mod#4]

Well if people kept doing the first counting to a million thread, we would have been done by now.

Especially the mods, because they have no flood limit.

[Caesar Augustus]

My point is there's no way in hell people are going to post every thirty seconds nonstop 24/7, and even then, if they could, it would practically take a year.

[Mod#4]

Bots could do it.

[Caesar Augustus]

Indeed, but for people, it's unreasonable to expect such a thing done in 10 years.

[Joest]

We have gotten to 42,000 in one thread. It's not totally unreasonable if every poster posts 10 consecutive numbers.

[JDitto]

lol, did you see "a million thanks" from Hoops and Yoyo?

Took so long...

[xanderono]

Hmm ok somebody go make a bot then you just leave it to post when your at school or work or not at your computer.

[Johnneylee]

Lol, like someoen can "Just Go Make a Bot"
Yeah, you should just go be the Pope.
and for that matter, bless Michael Jackson, and Make him a Bishop